"Why construct a 20 kilo-ton antihydrogen bomb when thousand times more powerful hydrogen bombs do already exist in the stockpiles of the superpowers? " Landua wrote.įollow Natalie Wolchover on Twitter nattyover. What's more, such ambition would be pointless. Antimatter Explosives are tier 4 explosive and one of the most devastating and costly in the ICBM arsenal. This appears ambitious even for the US military." Obviously, it would take 100 million years and $1,000 trillion to make 1 gram. Then we would have to deal with the problem of how to store so many particles (about 10,000,000,000,000,000 antiprotons). "With present CERN technology, we would be able to produce about 10 nanograms of antimatter per year, at a cost of about $10-20 million. "Take Dan Brown's hypothetical 1 gram of antimatter," he continued. "We do not have to worry about military applications." "Thanks to the inefficiency of the transformation process of energy into antimatter we are safe," CERN physicist Rolf Landua explained on the institute's website. File usage on Commons The following page uses this file: File:Antimatter Explosions 2.ogv File usage on other wikis The following other wikis use this file: Usage on ar. But the process is extremely inefficient just one billionth of the initial energy gets transformed into an antimatter particle. ANTIMATTER Summary edit Licensing edit File history Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time. They create antimatter by colliding accelerated particles at very high energies, a process that transforms kinetic energy into mass. Scientists are neither interested in creating nor able to create enough antimatter to make a world-destroying antimatter bomb.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |